First Look: Britney Spears Reveals The Artwork For Her New Single ?Till The World Ends?
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pinkisthenewblog/~3/1ZvxaisaYC8/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pinkisthenewblog/~3/1ZvxaisaYC8/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/imnotobsessed/obsessed/~3/lsjdaaimPF8/

Jay-Z and Beyonce skipped out of L.A. during the Oscar festivites, right after spending time in L.A. for the All-Star game. They headed for the sun and sand in the Carribean.
Pics from their vacay before they hit last night's Nets sidelines when you read on....


Bey rocked this cute multi colored jumper with her beach hat.

Loves these two. Fab vacay times...
Source: http://theybf.com/2011/03/01/beyonce-jay-z-skip-the-oscar-festivities-for-the-carribean
Bundled up in hats and scarves, actress Rachel Weisz and her 4-year-old son Henry looked ready for the cold winter weather as they headed out for a walk in New York City today (February 3).
The beautiful Constant Gardener star will be celebrating her 41st birthday in just a few days.
Source: http://celebritybabyscoop.com/2011/03/02/rachel-weisz-her-big-apple-boy
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/-NKMgdAV36I/
Source: http://www.ivillage.com/reba-join-country-music-hall-fame/1-h-328135

Katie Holmes is bringing out the big legal guns. The actress is suing Star magazine for $50 million in damages, after the tabloid published an issue insinuating she was a drug addict.
The cover of the issue in question shows an unflattering photo of Holmes with a caption that reads: "Addiction Nightmare: Katie Drug Shocker! The real reason she can't leave Tom." Inside, the story doesn't actually claim that Tom Cruise's wife was using drugs, but details her use of an "e-meter" during Scientology sessions, which allegedly reflects past emotional experiences.
"Of all the fabricated stories that continue to be published about me, this instance is beyond the pale. The publisher knew this outrageous story was false and printed it anyway to sell magazines," Holmes told PopEater in a statement.
According to her rep, Holmes was forced to file this lawsuit "to vindicate her reputation after American Media refused to retract its vicious lies about her."
"Star magazine's malicious claims about Katie are untrue, unethical and unlawful," Holmes' attorney Bert Fields said in an official statement. "Not only do they cruelly defame Katie, they play a cheap trick on the public, making ridiculously false claims on the cover unsupported by anything inside. Someone should bring a class action to get all buyers their money back."
But despite the libel lawsuit, Star is not backing down from their story.
"We have not been served with any papers yet, however Star fully stands behind the editorial integrity of what we have published concerning Ms. Holmes' controversial use of the Scientology e-meter," a rep for the mag said. "The physical effect of the e-meter on its users is a matter of significant public concern, and we plan to vigorously defend the suit filed by Ms. Holmes. Our attorneys look forward to deposing Ms. Holmes about her experiences with Scientology and the e-meter, and expect that the case will be promptly dismissed by the court."
Holmes and Cruise are tabloid regulars at this point, but it doesn't seem to make it any easier on them. In 2008, Holmes opened up to Vanity Fair about the toll the constant scrutiny was taking on her.
"I do know what is being said in the press," she said. "This is my family, and I do care about them. The stories are not OK. It eats away at me. Some of the crap that's out there -- it's really frustrating the amount of sh*t that's out there!"
Source: http://www.ivillage.com/katie-holmes-sues-tabloid-50-million/1-a-328029
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pinkisthenewblog/~3/H39n1L6QrXc/
Source: http://perezhilton.com/2011-03-02-weinstein-company-buys-rights-to-so-undercover

Last week, CBS and Warner Bros. made an announcement that everyone saw -- or should have seen -- coming: In light of Charlie Sheen's increasingly erratic behavior and off-the-wall radio interviews, the actor's hit sitcom Two and a Half Men was being pulled off the air for at least the remainder of the season.
Not surprisingly, Sheen did not take kindly to the news. After all, the guy makes a reported $1.8 million per episode, so CBS' decision not to film the last eight installments of the show's eighth season cost him roughly $14.4 million. Ouch. (Luckily, CBS will pay the Men crew -- who make significantly less than Charlie -- for four of the eight torpedoed episodes.)
In an interview with Today on Monday, Sheen insisted that it will be CBS that comes crawling back to him. "It's like everybody thinks I should be begging for my job back, and I'm just gonna forewarn them that it's everybody else that's going to be begging me for their job back," he said.
"I am a man of my word, so I will finish the TV show," he continued. "I'll even do season 10, but at this point, (because of) psychological distress -- oh my God -- it's $3 mil an episode, take it or leave it."
Sheen was joking (we think), but the question remains: Is there any scenario where Sheen and CBS can kiss and make up, put all of this behind them and get on with the series? And if so, would audiences still watch? In short: Should Sheen get his job back on Two and a Half Men?
We know what Sheen thinks. CBS honcho Les Moonves is less certain, judging by his comments at an investor conference in San Francisco on Tuesday. "Short term, it's actually financially a gainer for us," Moonves said of his decision to pull the plug on the rest of Two and a Half Men season 8 and instead run repeats of the show (which are drawing extremely solid ratings). "I'm not saying long term I want this to go on, or it's great," Moonves continued. "Going down the road, I don't know what's going to happen. I hope it's back. We'll see."
If Men does return, there's always the option of ditching Sheen in favor of another star. As a matter of fact, rumors are swirling that John Stamos may step in to fill the void. Don't worry, he wouldn't be playing Uncle Charlie, but rather a new character (Uncle Jesse perhaps?). Stamos is denying the chatter for now, while Sheen calls the rumors a "tragic joke." "If they do that," he told TMZ, "then they deserve their failures and the follies."
Tell us! What do you think? Should Charlie Sheen get his Two and a Half Men job back -- or is the show better off without him?
Source: http://www.ivillage.com/should-charlie-sheen-get-his-two-and-half-men-job-back-poll/1-a-327873